Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: devrim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/04/16 14:19, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-04-04 07:49, Tom Hughes wrote:
I have been trying to resolve the FTBFS status of geos and related
issued in F24/Rawhide for two months now, without any success as the
maintainer, devrim, is not responding in any meaningful way. The
original bug report is:

   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305276

If you post a dist-git patch there, perhaps a provenpackager will apply
it for you.

I've attached a patch to the original bug:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1143721

There's still a wider question here though about how to make the policy more workable in the face of a packager who responds only in the most technical of senses...

Tom

--
Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx)
http://compton.nu/
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux