On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Phil Sutter wrote: > >> So I will stick to my former plan of not rebasing iproute in stable >> releases (unless there's good reason) but become open for feature >> requests if there is valid need for it, a backport is feasible and it >> doesn't interfere with core functionality. ACK? > > Does iproute going to have a more conservative policy than the kernel? > It looks pretty ridiculous. > > iproute2 is released always immediately after every kernel > for very good reasons: > https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=145799701511959 > https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=145253104507275 > https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=144659766717141 > [...] > > Right now, Fedora 23 kernel is "4.4" and iproute is still "4.1". > A nonsense. There is no need to call this ridiculous or nonsense. There have been valid reasons brought up in this very thread for being somewhat conservative. Please refrain from using language that makes the conversation negative. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
