Phil Sutter wrote: > So I will stick to my former plan of not rebasing iproute in stable > releases (unless there's good reason) but become open for feature > requests if there is valid need for it, a backport is feasible and it > doesn't interfere with core functionality. ACK? Does iproute going to have a more conservative policy than the kernel? It looks pretty ridiculous. iproute2 is released always immediately after every kernel for very good reasons: https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=145799701511959 https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=145253104507275 https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=144659766717141 [...] Right now, Fedora 23 kernel is "4.4" and iproute is still "4.1". A nonsense. iproute2 should stay close to the its kernel version. And this rule should be applied also to others kernel related utils/tools. --- -I_T3XvzPaM -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
