On Monday, March 14, 2016 2:45:58 PM CDT Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 14.3.2016 v 12:26 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Dne 12.3.2016 v 15:32 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a): > >>> ===== SUMMARY ===== > >>> Added packages: 11 > >>> Dropped packages: 0 > >>> Upgraded packages: 164 > >>> Downgraded packages: 2 > >> > >> Interesting, is this already 4th downgraded package this week? > > > > It's not really interesting at all, they've all been because: > > 1) people don't understand that 2.1-1.20150701 is lower than 28.20140911 > > 2) people when moving from alpha to beta reset the release to lower so > > 0.3alphaX becomes 0.1betaX with the later being lower. > > The point was to open the discussion about this, since this shows that > how the NVR works is not obvious and may be we should have some better > tooling? > > I can imagine something a bit smarter then rpmdev-bumpspec (probably > part of fedpkg), where you would enter new version and it would update > the spec correctly or it would fail with error in case version was lower > then it was previously. > perhaps having some testing built into fedpkg pre build. possibly also pre commit Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
