Dne 29.2.2016 v 16:10 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 16:01 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Is this (1) new version of Rawhide report which will stay or (2) is this >> just some temporary version or (3) is it something completely new and >> the old Rawhide report is not sent just due to some issues? >> >> If (1) is the case, then it is missing broken dependencies and the has >> readability regresses. > It is (1). releng already knows that broken dependencies are missing, > and they're working to get it back. Thx for explanation. > For readability issues you can file > tickets (or pull requests!) at https://pagure.io/compose-utils . > > Note that I'm currently working to add the image checks from the > "compose check report"s to this email, then the "compose check report" > emails would just be openQA status emails. My complain is for example about the glibc in this specific report. Look at the amount of listed RPMS and they are duplicated once more as Added RPMS. Yes, this might be interesting information, but 3 pages of glibc subpackages does not help. Actually, I don't understand, why the email is word wrapped. It causes plenty of formation issues. My email client is capable enough to wrap the lines when needed. Vít -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
