> On Feb 28, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Lars Seipel <lars.seipel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Yeah, I think the best approach would be to have all the langpacks offer a >> virtual Provides: glibc-langpack and have the main package Requires: >> glibc-langpack and Suggests: glibc-all-langpacks. > > This would force the installation of at least one langpack, no? The C, > POSIX and *C.UTF-8* locales are builtin, so for many systems it is very > reasonable to run without any language pack installed. Yeah, the workaround we're doing there is to have a glibc-minimal-langpacks subpackage that satisfies the requirement but contains no actual files. It's a bit of a hack, but not a particularly awful one. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
