On 02/18/2016 08:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Peter Robinson wrote: >> It's an issue we see occasionally where the package thinks it knows >> better than the explicit CFLAGs being set, I'll get it sorted out. > > But why are those intrinsics now requiring NEON at all? Those are GCC byte > swap intrinsics documented as being architecture-independent and should be > implemented in software (through shifts or rotates) when there is no native > byte swap instruction. > > And is Fedora actually requiring NEON as the baseline on ARM? I thought it > was not. We require an ARMv7A or newer and a VFP with enough registers to support the hard ABI e.g. -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 The message in the header error is only an example. Cheers, Carlos. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
