On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 06:41:51PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On St, 2016-02-17 at 08:10 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > > > I'm not sure what you're asking here. We have 2 different binaries > > already. I don't see any reason to add more or rename the existing > > ones. > > I meant renaming the gnupg-1 binary to gpg1 and make the /usr/bin/gpg a > symlink to it via the alternatives system so if user install only > gnupg2 the symlink would point to gpg2. But the default can still be a > symlink to gpg1. I think using the alternatives would just cause confusion. I think the best approach is to find the things that are assuming gpg 1 and 2 are the same and fix them to use the right one. -- Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
