Re: rpmlint FAILED for cppad-20160000.0-2.fc24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >>>>> "KP" == Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> KP> Hello, we have an RFE for adding a rpmlint whitelist feature here:
> KP> https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T692
> 
> I can't actually log into phabricator to respond there, 

Just log in with your fasusername@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx email. If you receive an error the first time, please try again, there's a bug somewhere :)

> but really this
> needs to be with the spec file.
> 
> I edit spec files in vim, with syntastic calling rpmlint to check syntax
> on the fly.  Having a per-package rpmlintrc is the only reasonable way
> to handle this kind of thing; taskotron just needs to know how to get to
> it.  I really wish more packagers did this, because sometimes rpmlint
> has so many complaints about a package that you have to wonder if
> anyone's actually run it against the package I'm viewing.  

I added your feedback to the ticket.

> Having
> taskotron do some spamming is a great start.

That was actually a mistake, we want to inform people by default only about "release critical" checks, which rpmlint is not. But improvements on this are planned for the future.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux