Re: Intent to orphan shorewall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/08/2016 08:31 AM, Raphael Groner wrote:
> You should not orphan packages in rawhide, not cause of "not used any
> more". Check upstream for activity and users. What about future security
> patches? To retire shorewall is obviously a bad idea. I would be happy to
> see someone to take and continue shorewall maintainership, at least in
> rawhide. But I do not feel competent enough to do it by myself.


Orphaning isn't the same as "retiring". Orphaning means "I can't maintain this
any more" and it's an invitation for someone else to step up and do so.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAla4mUAACgkQeiVVYja6o6NRGwCfSpAeRNjKs9CKp3ayYdlR5U7D
/j4An15IxYzdTANbAaLJV6ApZGl6pLX4
=dfKX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux