Re: dnf still is unuseable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Montag, den 18.01.2016, 12:27 +0000 schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
> On 18/01/16 07:05 -0500, Honza Šilhan wrote:
> > yes, autoremoval issue could be either caused by bad packaging [1]
> > or when you are
> > installing packages via yum or packagekit [2]. We are working on
> > better integration
> > between DNF and PK so this could be fixed soon. At the meantime use
> > this workaround [3].
> 
> It's a *terrible* workaround though. "Make a note of everything that
> gets installed using PK and then as root run dnf to mark them as
> userinstalled". A better workaround is "Don't use PK to install
> things, use DNF". Why bother using PK at all if you then have to go
> and run DNF commands for the same packages? You might as well just
> use
> DNF.
Because sometimes PK says there are updates available while "dnf update
--refresh" says no updates are available? 
Happend to me several times in the past.
-- 
Regards,

Heiko Adams

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux