On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:37:25PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:19:07 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote: > > > > https://release-monitoring.org/project/8847/ > > > > Yeah, looking at the message history for eicil helps show what > > happened: > > > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/raw?package=eiciel > > > > It looks like someone added eicil to release-monitoring.org, which > > triggered a check. > > And the check didn't notice that there is no new upstream release? > > > Does that help? > > A bit. I'm aware of the release monitoring services, and it's ON for > some of my packages. But this particular message is confusing, since there > is no new upstream release. Last one is from Sep 2015. And notifying about > an update that is no update doesn't make sense. Yeah, could you file a bug on https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness about this, when you ahve time, please? From a quick look at the code, it looks like you will receive a notification like this if pkgdb monitoring is set to False.. but you will receive *no* notification in this scenario if monitoring is set to True (kind of the opposite of what you'd expect). https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/blob/develop/hotness/consumers.py#L195-L262
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
