Re: Debugging practices and hardened packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 11:39:23 +0100, Roman Tsisyk wrote:
> -debuginfo should be for the same build version as a binary itself.
> Most users never install -debuginfo.

GDB instructs them they should:
$ gdb -q xvinfo
Reading symbols from xvinfo...Reading symbols from /root/xvinfo...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Missing separate debuginfos, use: dnf debuginfo-install xorg-x11-utils-7.5-20.fc23.x86_64
(gdb) _


> I'm not sure that old packages are tracked somewhere for, say, rawhide.

Only in ABRT server retracing infrastructure.  They are also tracked in
darkserver build-id to NVRA mapper (that should be under some rework).

But debugging old packages from Rawhide does not make much sense IMO, it is
more meaningful for RHEL/CentOS servers.


Jan
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux