Re: Firefox build?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Bojan Smojver <bojan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric Griffith <egriffith92 <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Is there any reason Fedora would not...? Regardless you could diff the
> source code that was used to make the 43.0.1-fedora RPM vs whats in 43.0.2
> and see if the hole is unpatched.
>
> There may be a reason. Fedora relies on NSS/NSPR packages for some of the
> stuff that Windows folks get bundled with FF, AFAIK. So, a maintainer of FF
> would know such things.
>
> Comparing source will not necessarily give the correct answer, as that part
> of it may be unused in Fedora builds. Again, maintainer of FF would know.
> Ergo, the question.
>

Is there a simple way to test if the issue is a problem on Fedora? I
don't even know of any sites with TLS 1.2 using MD5 signatures,
especially when Chrome "broke" signatures that weren't SHA-256 or
better for SSLv3 and stronger a year ago...


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux