On Dec 28, 2015 18:02, "Bojan Smojver" <bojan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Reindl Harald <h.reindl <at> thelounge.net> writes:
>
> > what do you try to tell us with that question?
>
> I'm trying to establish whether Fedora needs a 43.0.2 (or better) build of
> FF in order to close this security hole.
>
Is there any reason Fedora would not...? Regardless you could diff the source code that was used to make the 43.0.1-fedora RPM vs whats in 43.0.2 and see if the hole is unpatched.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
