On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 18:30 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:06:59 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > > Two observations: Where's the patch to be found? And shouldn't you use > > > Sylpheed rather than Evolution? ;) > > > > > Heh heh now that it does gpg signing/verification on my box I might start using > > it :-) Truth to tell, there are some features of Evolution I'm somewhat loathe > > to lose so I might have to bounce between the two mailers for a while depending > > on what I'm doing. > > > > The current version of the patch can be found here: > > http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/sylpheed-gpgme1.0-12.patch > > Thanks. I'm going to apply this and also serve as a guinea pig, because > currently I still use a GPGME 0.3.x enabled Sylpheed. > > GPGME 1.0 and dependencies are in the fedora.us submission list > already. Bugs: 2178 -> 2179 -> 2180 <- 2185 > > Among the things to examine are: > > * Dependencies on GPGME 0.4.x: gpa, elmo > * Dependencies on GPGME 0.3.x: cryptplug, seahorse, sylpheed-claws > (seahorse is very old, but pcomptom said maybe he will continue it) Actually, newer seahorse requires gpgme-1.0.x as well Phil
