On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:06:59 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > Two observations: Where's the patch to be found? And shouldn't you use > > Sylpheed rather than Evolution? ;) > > > Heh heh now that it does gpg signing/verification on my box I might start using > it :-) Truth to tell, there are some features of Evolution I'm somewhat loathe > to lose so I might have to bounce between the two mailers for a while depending > on what I'm doing. > > The current version of the patch can be found here: > http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/sylpheed-gpgme1.0-12.patch Thanks. I'm going to apply this and also serve as a guinea pig, because currently I still use a GPGME 0.3.x enabled Sylpheed. GPGME 1.0 and dependencies are in the fedora.us submission list already. Bugs: 2178 -> 2179 -> 2180 <- 2185 Among the things to examine are: * Dependencies on GPGME 0.4.x: gpa, elmo * Dependencies on GPGME 0.3.x: cryptplug, seahorse, sylpheed-claws (seahorse is very old, but pcomptom said maybe he will continue it) * In which way or whether cryptplug uses gpgsm? * Is cryptplug of any use in FC3? * How are gpa and elmo affected by an upgrade from gpgme 0.4.x?
