On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:20:34 -0500, Zach Villers wrote: > > Anything about that in /var/log/dnf*? > > > > Yes - here is a grep of "kernel" from /var/log/dnf - you can see the > kernels that were removed in the transaction - > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/298642/ Don't use grep for tasks like that. It cuts off context. There are multiple log files for "dnf". They would clearly show if any kernel packages have been removed. I doubt that the behaviour for an increased installonly_limit would be different. E.g /var/log/dnf.log: | Removed: | kernel.x86_64 4.2.5-300.fc23 kernel-core.x86_64 4.2.5-300.fc23 | kernel-modules.x86_64 4.2.5-300.fc23 | | Installed: | kernel.x86_64 4.2.7-300.fc23 kernel-core.x86_64 4.2.7-300.fc23 | kernel-modules.x86_64 4.2.7-300.fc23 | |Upgraded: [...] In /var/log/dnf.rpm.log there are individual update status lines, such as: | Dec 13 13:52:35 INFO Erased: kernel-4.2.5-300.fc23.x86_64 | Dec 13 13:52:35 INFO Erased: kernel-4.2.5-300.fc23.x86_64 > What does "dnf history info NUMBER" tell about that transaction? > > > > dnf history info doesn't warn about the removal of the kernels. Another > fpaste; > > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/298647/95915451/ That also sounds much like DNF did not install/erase your kernel packages normally but treated them like ordinary packages. E.g. Erase kernel-4.2.5-300.fc23.x86_64 @updates Install kernel-4.2.7-300.fc23.x86_64 @updates-testing Erase kernel-core-4.2.5-300.fc23.x86_64 @updates Install kernel-core-4.2.7-300.fc23.x86_64 @updates-testing Upgraded kernel-headers-4.2.6-301.fc23.x86_64 @updates Upgrade 4.2.7-300.fc23.x86_64 @updates-testing Erase kernel-modules-4.2.5-300.fc23.x86_64 @updates Install kernel-modules-4.2.7-300.fc23.x86_64 @updates-testing > installonlypkgs=kernel.x86_64, kernel-core.x86_64, kernel-headers.x86_64, > kernel-modules.x86_64 That could be the culprit. Why and when did you set this? If memory serves correctly, the implicit default also covers kernel packages correctly. And if changing it, it's supposed to be a space separated list, isn't it? -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
