Re: dnf behavior expected?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:39:50 -0500, Zach Villers wrote:

> Sorry if this is the wrong list;
> 
> I am running the rawhide-no-debug-alloc kernel with F23. I had three saved
> 4.3 kernels. dnf.conf was not changed. I wanted to keep a total of six
> kernels and edited /etc/dnf/protected.d/dnf.conf to read;
> 
> [main]
> gpgcheck=1
> installonlypkgs=kernel.x86_64, kernel-core.x86_64, kernel-headers.x86_64,
> kernel-modules.x86_64
> installonly_limit=6
> clean_requirements_on_remove=true
> 
> I then copied the edited dnf.conf to /etc/dnf/.
> 
> I ran sudo dnf update and received NO warning of packages to be
> deleted. 4.4.0-0.rc3.git3.2.fc24.x86_64 was installed. I looked in /boot
> and found only this newest kernel was installed. Where did my old kernels
> go? Is this expected behavior?

Anything about that in /var/log/dnf*?
What does "dnf history info NUMBER" tell about that transaction?
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux