On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:58:41PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 10.12.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Rex Dieter:
> >Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> >>When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires:
> >>dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking
> >>purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies have
> >>run. But are the files already there?
> >
> >I think the answer in general is no, you cannot be guaranteed that Requires:
> >get installed before %post runs. That's one reason why Requires(post)
> >exists
>
> sounds terrible
>
> what's with the "Require" of a "Requires(post)" to guarantee that
> the "Requires(post)" *really* work sucessful? sounds fragile
Relax, the difference between Requires and Requires(post) is rather
small. It only makes a difference when breaking dependency cycles,
and in that case there's no correct solution anyway.
I.e. if package A has "Requires: B" and package B has
"Requires(post): A", there's really no correct order.
"First A then B" is incorrect because "A Requires B" may mean that
B must by 100% installed (with postinstall scriptlets) for A to work,
thus A may still not work in B's post script.
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder mls@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
