Re: RFC: switching from grubby to grub2-mkconfig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Since the old proposal to have the bootloader automatically enumerate
> boot options never went anywhere, can we do the next best thing?
>
> Specifically, these days grub2-mkconfig appears to produce output
> that's functionally identical to what grubby generates.  Can we switch
> new-kernel-pkg to just regenerate the grub2 config using
> grub2-mkconfig instead of using grubby?
>
> Debian has worked like this forever, and IMO it's superior in pretty
> much all respects.  There are already nice config hooks for making
> custom changes, and they're a lot more reliable than trusting grubby
> to do what you expect it to do.

Well mkconfig can produce a configuration that does not actually work
when grub2 itself gets updated (in which case the bootloader does not
get rewritten).
Until this is fixed grub2-mkconfig is dangerous and should not be used.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux