----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Till Maas < opensource@xxxxxxxxx > wrote: > > > On Mo, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:28:57 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Is there any reason not to use the date as the version? It's in YYYYMMDD > > format so there shouldn't be a upgrade path issue but this isn't explicitly > > covered in the packaging guidelines that I can find. > > If you make it as a post release from the latest regular release, you > can easily adjust if they go back to normal releases without requiring > an epoch. > > I agree that would work, but staying canonical with upstream, if they ask, > "What version are you using?", 0.4.1 is not the correct answer. I think it > would be different if I was doing actual checkouts but they provide archives > which include the date. > > Thanks, > Richard > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Hi, they now use 'daily-YYYYMMDD' as the version, it is even shown in the about dialog. They provide daily builds. It doesn't seem they are going to change this release model in the near future (but I will recheck with them). Personally I would go with YYYYMMDD as the version. Anytime later, if the release model change, we will be able to add epoch and use different numbering. Just my two cents thanks & regards Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
