Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dne 18.11.2015 v 15:53 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Panu Matilainen
>> <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Right. Only took eight years for anybody to notice ;)
>>>
>>>         - Panu -
>>>
>> At this point, I'm wondering why we don't use the ~/+ operators to
>> more explicitly declare the ordering of versions like Debian does. As
>> far as I know, RPM does actually support this in every release the
>> Fedora Project supports, except for EL5/6. But with those two, we
>> already have to do a lot of weird things for compatibility in their
>> specs that we're allowed to not have to do for the rest.
>>
>> I don't know if anyone even understands how version comparison even
>> works in RPM fully...
>>
>>
>>
>
> Feel free to reopen the discussion. You have my support.
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/398
>
>
> Vít

Done[1]. This is just getting dumb and we need something simpler. I
can't even figure out how to do pre-release/post-release anymore...

[1]: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/398#comment:20


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux