I am not the maintainer of guacamole-server. That is Simone Caronni (who I cc'd to this email) according to PkgDB[0]. Simone is the one you want to ask, really. [0]: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/guacamole-server/ On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Pavel Alexeev <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Neal. > If I right understand you are maintainer of guacamole? Do you wish proceed > with freerdp-compat package only? > > 09.11.2015 13:11, Pavel Alexeev пишет: > > 08.11.2015 23:38, Neal Gompa пишет: > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Pavel Alexeev <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hello. >> >> More than half year in the past freerdp was updated and then reverted >> version to current present [1], mostly to allow built guacamole-server [2]. >> >> As I see it still stick with that version. >> Meantime freerdp move forward. Remmina, which require fresh versions of >> freerdp also can't be updated. >> >> Recently our bundling policy changed [3]. >> >> From freerdp depends: >> $ dnf repoquery --source --alldeps --whatrequires freerdp-libs >> ... >> freerdp-1.2.0-0.9.git.24a752a.fc23.src.rpm >> guacamole-server-0.9.7-1.fc23.src.rpm >> medusa-2.2-0.rc1.2.fc23.1.src.rpm >> remmina-1.2.0-0.8.git.b3237e8.fc23.src.rpm >> vinagre-3.18.1-1.fc23.src.rpm >> vlc-2.2.2-0.1.fc23.src.rpm (rpmfusion.org) >> weston-1.9.0-1.fc23.src.rpm >> >> $ dnf repoquery --source --alldeps --whatrequires freerdp >> ... >> krdc-15.04.2-2.fc23.src.rpm >> >> Today I have try build freerdp [4] from master and all dependencies >> against it. >> >> And again, *only* guacamole-server fails to build with: >> In file included from rdp_stream.h:29:0, >> from rdp_fs.c:27: >> rdp_svc.h:28:38: fatal error: freerdp/utils/svc_plugin.h: No such file or >> directory >> compilation terminated. >> >> It relied on old svc_plugin which has been rid in 2013 year [5]. >> >> Main question. Is it a good reason to bundle copy of current version >> freerdp into guacamole-server (at least until someone do not willing port >> it) and update it for rest of Fedora? >> >> I have not tried to do such bundle yet, but if no one argue I could try do >> that with update freerdp and rebuild all other deps too. >> >> [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-March/209140.html >> [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-March/209181.html >> [3] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/575 >> [4] https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP >> [5] https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/pull/1574 >> >> -- >> With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev. >> Yes, I'm a fool - I believe in people, honesty, goodness and justice. And >> also in the fact that I can make this world just a little better unless stop >> fighting. >> http://hubbitus.info >> > > Given that the last time someone asked about getting guacamole to work on > the latest FreeRDP, they said they won't do it[1], I'm inclined to suggest > you should go ahead and try that. > > Sorry, but I do not very interesting in guacamole and it seams is not very > trivial task. > > I have asked FreeRDP to put out a release before[2], and they've just marked > it for "2.0" milestone, whenever that happens... > > Another option would be to set up the current FreeRDP library as a "compat" > package that can be parallel installed with the latest FreeRDP from > upstream, which might be possible with some finagling. > > That may be an option. Do you think it is a better way? It will require new > review, but still need only for single package. > > > [1]: https://glyptodon.org/jira/browse/GUAC-1130 > [2]: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/issues/2839 > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > > > -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
