Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

Pavel Alexeev <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> · Mon, 9 Nov 2015 13:11:43 +0300



    08.11.2015 23:38, Neal Gompa пишет:

    
        On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at
            2:31 PM, Pavel Alexeev <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

        
               Hello.

                
                More than half year in the past freerdp was updated and
                then reverted version to current present [1], mostly to
                allow built guacamole-server [2].

                
                As I see it still stick with that version.

                Meantime freerdp move forward. Remmina, which require
                fresh versions of freerdp also can't be updated.

                
                Recently our bundling policy changed [3].

                
                From freerdp depends:

                $ dnf repoquery --source --alldeps --whatrequires
                freerdp-libs

                ...

                freerdp-1.2.0-0.9.git.24a752a.fc23.src.rpm

                guacamole-server-0.9.7-1.fc23.src.rpm

                medusa-2.2-0.rc1.2.fc23.1.src.rpm

                remmina-1.2.0-0.8.git.b3237e8.fc23.src.rpm

                vinagre-3.18.1-1.fc23.src.rpm

                vlc-2.2.2-0.1.fc23.src.rpm (rpmfusion.org)

                weston-1.9.0-1.fc23.src.rpm

                
                $ dnf repoquery --source --alldeps --whatrequires
                freerdp

                ...

                krdc-15.04.2-2.fc23.src.rpm

                
                Today I have try build freerdp [4] from master and all
                dependencies against it.

                
                And again, *only* guacamole-server fails to build with:

                In file included from rdp_stream.h:29:0,

                                 from rdp_fs.c:27:

                rdp_svc.h:28:38: fatal error:
                freerdp/utils/svc_plugin.h: No such file or directory

                compilation terminated.

                
                It relied on old svc_plugin which has been rid in 2013
                year [5].

                
                Main question. Is it a good reason to bundle copy of
                current version freerdp into guacamole-server (at least
                until someone do not willing port it) and update it for
                rest of Fedora?

                
                I have not tried to do such bundle yet, but if no one
                argue I could try do that with update freerdp and
                rebuild all other deps too.

                
                [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-March/209140.html

                [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-March/209181.html

                [3] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/575

                [4] https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP

                [5] https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/pull/1574

                    
                    -- 

                        With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev.

                        Yes, I'm a fool - I believe in people, honesty,
                        goodness and justice. And also in the fact that
                        I can make this world just a little better
                        unless stop fighting.

                        http://hubbitus.info

                      
          Given that the last time
            someone asked about getting guacamole to work on the latest
            FreeRDP, they said they won't do it[1], I'm inclined to
            suggest you should go ahead and try that.
        
      
    Sorry, but I do not very interesting in guacamole and it seams is
    not very trivial task.

    
           I have asked FreeRDP to put
            out a release before[2], and they've just marked it for
            "2.0" milestone, whenever that happens...
          

          Another option would be to set
            up the current FreeRDP library as a "compat" package that
            can be parallel installed with the latest FreeRDP from
            upstream, which might be possible with some finagling. 

          
    That may be an option. Do you think it is a better way? It will
    require new review, but still need only for single package.

    
          [1]: https://glyptodon.org/jira/browse/GUAC-1130
          [2]: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/issues/2839
          

          -- 

          
            真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!

            
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct