Am 12.11.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Andrew Lutomirski:
On Nov 12, 2015 6:39 AM, "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > who says you that a update for F22 would behave identical on F23 or the other direction when half of the OS has different versions of libraries and the whole userland? > > it may often work that way but to assume it is so by definition is a dangerous game, i saw enough Fedora bugs the past 8 years after dist-upgrades where the affected application had exactly the same version as before the upgrade and behaved wrong or failed completly I said no such thing. (Can you please try to stop being combative by default?)
can you please stop accuse somebody beeing combative?
I think that Bodhi should arrange, at least by default, to push things in the correct order. Whether that means that karma is required separately for each branch is an orthogonal issue, except insofar as allowing karma from one branch to carry over to another would also require Bodhi to track that two updates are the same thing but just to different branches. At the very least, Bodhi should *not* push to F22 due to autokarma until F23 stable is requested
for "dnf distro-sync" or "yum distro-sync" over years that all don't matter because it simply downgrades a package in that case and so it would be better to fix other upgrade methods to act the same way
there is no point for me wait for a F22 update which fixes a bug reported for F22 just because there is not enough karma for the irrelevant F23 build
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
