On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 00:29:10 -0800 Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No, the OP had it right. In some cases, we can wind up with older > updates being pushed over newer ones. That is, if an update > 'foo-2.0-1' is submitted, then an update 'foo-2.0-2' is submitted, > then 'foo-2.0-2' is pushed stable, then 'foo-2.0-1' is pushed stable > *later* (which can happen with auto-karma if the foo-2.0-1 update is > never withdrawn), 2.0-1 can be pushed over the top of 2.0-2. > > There are some safeguards against this, I think, but it does still > sometimes seem to happen in some circumstances, like this one. Yeah. Bodhi will normally obsolete an older update when you submit the newer one, however thats not always possible: * The older update may be locked in a currently happening push. * The older update may be part of an update with 10 other packages. The main bug/issue here is that when bodhi pushes things it asks koji to move the tags as required, but there's no ordering to that request. So, it says: "hey koji, move the tags on these 100 packages over to f23 for me" and koji does them in whatever order it wants, then whatever is the thing last tagged "wins" as far as being the one thats pushed out. Luke is aware of this bug and is working on a way to detect/fix this stuff, but it's not easy. > In this > case it seems like they got pushed stable in the same transaction, >> but > 1.06-1.fc23 was ordered slightly later than 1.07-1.fc23: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Event-RPC-1.07-1.fc23#comment-332357 > (18:03:30.614903) > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Event-RPC-1.06-1.fc23#comment-332364 > (18:03:31.486243) > > and 1.06-1.fc23 won. In > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/23/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/p/ > , we find: > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/23/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/p/perl-Event-RPC-1.06-1.fc23.noarch.rpm > > not 1.07-1. The best thing we can do about these cases right now is for maintainers to PAY ATTENTION. If you have multiple updates in flight for the same package, please make sure they don't both go stable at the same time. Failing that, when you notice these issues after the fact, file a releng ticket and we can retag things in the right order so it gets fixed. kevin
Attachment:
pgpn9uGrJ633J.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
