Re: Fedora 23 Final RC10 status is GO !

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 13:56 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kamil Paral wrote:
> > So we could ignore freeze just for packages not being on any install
> > medium. But then I'm not sure how much that is helpful and it might be
> > difficult to implement this in Bodhi.
> 
> In the old manual process, I just had to ask rel-eng and they'd blanket-OK 
> freeze overrides for such packages (with the same arguments as yours, i.e., 
> it cannot really break anything).

Yes - and that frequently went wrong. That's precisely why we ditched
that process and came up with a better one, where the decision isn't
made on-the-fly by whoever happens to be reading the tickets in releng,
but is made according to an established process, by a sensible group of
stakeholders, with proper tracking and a paper trail.

>  These days, such freeze override requests 
> get blanket-rejected instead (because it doesn't make much of a difference, 
> so they don't see any reason to make exceptions to the processes).

Nothing gets blanket rejected. Each FE proposal is evaluated
individually on its merits.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux