Am 01.11.2015 um 23:20 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 17:53 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in the installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If not it's too much of a moving target to try and QA and ensure everything works as expected. To freeze is a fairly standard procedure for all distro development.Yeah, but most distros stay frozen... to unfreeze after release -- let alone with 500 updates on day zero! -- is something uniquely Fedora. Really, only my updates should be allowed out to users. All of yours should have to wait for the next release. Obviously not a serious statement, but we all think our own updates are important, whereas collectively it is important to Fedora to reduce the quantity of updates. That implies individual maintainers shouldn't have final say on updates....
nonsenseif individual should not have final say on updates one could use also Debian and *not* Fedora - the is no perfect reason because issues are different
refrain from updates may keep annoying bugs currently in Fedora fixed soon and updates *may* introduce new bugs
*who* if not the package maintainer which hopefully uses his own packages should have the final say? some group of people not understanding the issues really?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
