On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 17:53 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in the > installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If > not > it's too much of a moving target to try and QA and ensure everything > works as expected. To freeze is a fairly standard procedure for all > distro development. Yeah, but most distros stay frozen... to unfreeze after release -- let alone with 500 updates on day zero! -- is something uniquely Fedora. Really, only my updates should be allowed out to users. All of yours should have to wait for the next release. Obviously not a serious statement, but we all think our own updates are important, whereas collectively it is important to Fedora to reduce the quantity of updates. That implies individual maintainers shouldn't have final say on updates.... Michael -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
