On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push >> > an update for F23 also. >> >> I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after all the >> F-23 >> freezing stages? It may cause FTBFSes or even broken builds. What is >> then >> all the release engineering good for? Why not to just run Rawhide then? >> > > I have to agree. I have been bitten too many times by minor tweaks breaking > builds in the OS. However the rules where a completely frozen build system > was causing problems in the past so I am expecting make is considered less > important than gcc? We have been shipping gcc bugfix updates all the time ... there is no reason why we shouldn't do the same for make. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
