On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push
> > an update for F23 also.
>
> I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after all the F-23
> freezing stages? It may cause FTBFSes or even broken builds. What is then
> all the release engineering good for? Why not to just run Rawhide then?
>
I have to agree. I have been bitten too many times by minor tweaks breaking builds in the OS. However the rules where a completely frozen build system was causing problems in the past so I am expecting make is considered less important than gcc?
> This situation may be a FAQ, sorry I do not read every mail here. I did not
> want to be negative/discouraging, just I have seen such FTBFS regression(s) in
> Fedora in the past.
>
>
> Jan
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
