On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 01:56 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: > --On Saturday, January 01, 2005 2:48 PM -0500 Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > There is not a lot of patching in the Fedora kernel. 2.6.10 will run > > happily in the FC environment unpatched as the tmpfs selinux patchesare > > now in > > It would be nice if each of the patches in the kernel spec file had a > comment explaining what it was for and why it was needed. (Pointers to > bugzillas for each would be adequate.) I've been afraid to use vanilla > kernels because I didn't know what those patches did and what would break > if I didn't have them. there is such a comment for each patch. I put them at the place where the patch got applied; I'm not sure where Dave puts them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
