Re: "vanilla" kernel closest to Fedora kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:01:08PM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Yeap, i thought about that, but the problem is that the developers of
> the patch (driver) may ignore bug reports from people not using the
> vanilla kernel. I know that the Fedora kernel is not too bastardized
> (it's pretty close to vanilla, like Arjan said) but... <shrug>

IME the vanilla kernel (2.6.9 anyway; I haven't tried 2.6.10 yet) works
well enough with Fedora.

FWIW, if you end up going with 2.6.9, then after you get vanilla 2.6.9
working, you may want to try a 2.6.9-ac kernel (e.g. 2.6.9-ac16). IIRC
2.6.9-ac is more up-to-date in terms of security fixes than vanilla
2.6.9, and the ac patches are less invasive than the Fedora ones so it's
easier to merge them with 3rd-party patches. (At least, that's my
experience.)

-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@xxxxxxxxx>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux