On 06.10.2015 09:13, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2015-10-05, Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Quick upgrade path question: I intend to retire the tesseract-langpack
package, which provides many tesseract-langpack-$lang subpackages,
It does not matter whether a (sub-)package is produced by building
one source package or another. Neither rpm nor dnf uses this information.
and instead have the main tesseract package to provide these, with the
same name.
Provide what? Export Provides: tesseract-langpack-$lang RPM symbol in
another binary package, or build tesseract-langpack-$lang sub-package
from another source package?
(Provides was a bad word to use, what I meant was that
tesseract-langpack-$lang coming from the tesseract-langpack resp.
tesseract package.)
In the first case you should add Obsoletes into the another binary
package, otherwise the old tesseract-langpack-$lang binary packages
remain insalled on a system.
In the second case you don't have to add Obsoletes because the there
the old tesseract-langpack-$lang binary packages will be upgraded to new
tesseract-langpack-$lang binary packages because they have the same
name.
Okay thanks.
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
