On 2015-10-05, Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Quick upgrade path question: I intend to retire the tesseract-langpack > package, which provides many tesseract-langpack-$lang subpackages, It does not matter whether a (sub-)package is produced by building one source package or another. Neither rpm nor dnf uses this information. > and instead have the main tesseract package to provide these, with the > same name. Provide what? Export Provides: tesseract-langpack-$lang RPM symbol in another binary package, or build tesseract-langpack-$lang sub-package from another source package? In the first case you should add Obsoletes into the another binary package, otherwise the old tesseract-langpack-$lang binary packages remain insalled on a system. In the second case you don't have to add Obsoletes because the there the old tesseract-langpack-$lang binary packages will be upgraded to new tesseract-langpack-$lang binary packages because they have the same name. > The version of the tesseract-langpack-$lang subpackages > increases in the process. > I understand this as the second case. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
