On 09/17/2015 07:26 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > And to pre-answer something that might be related, there is no budget to > put this into a CDN. Those are extremely expensive operations and do not > volunteer space. Some of them do, for Debian at least. But I don't know what has happened to early attempts in that direction, lack of IPv6 support was a bit of a dealbreaker back then. The problem I see is that CDNs are only work well if you use popular resources because unlikely mirrors, local nodes are not preseeded with content almost no one ever downloads. So getting a SRPM or source tarball from a CDN will likely trigger a local cache miss and a sluggish CDN-internal download. For my needs and my network location, the Fedora (and CentOS and Debian) mirror infrastructure offers significantly better performance than cdn.redhat.com. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
