Re: Freeimage 3.10 -> 3.17 upgrade, dealing with library incompatibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/17/2015 10:28 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:

> - abi_compliance_checker reports that compatibility was not broken
> between libfreeimage of 3.10 and 3.17. However, in libfreeimageplus,
> various function signatures have changed due to switching from WORD (aka
> unsigned short) to unsigned for various size related parameters. The
> soname was not changed, so this is an upstream error.

Why doesn't abi_compliance_checker report this?  Doesn't such a
modification change the list of exported symbols due to C++ name mangling?

-- 
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux