Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 10:13 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

> We also haven't established any kind of migration plan between the
> two
> repositories. In the darktable example, one of the reasons we ended
> up
> going back to the FPC and re-requesting an exception was that we
> don't
> have any mechanisms for moving an application out of the Fedora
> repositories and into COPR automatically. So upgrades would be
> broken.

The big thing for me was that we can't use stuff from outside the
Fedora repos to build Fedora products - so we couldn't include
darktable in the design spin if it was in COPR.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux