On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:35 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > As for which components, it's not about specific examples[1]. It's > about solving the question in a generic way. We have quite a lot of > software that isn't packaged for Fedora (either not started or > aborted > when the package review couldn't be passed) that has genuine value. I can certainly confirm that. I dug through quite a lot of review requests yesterday to look at how the rules have been applied in practice, and found several that have been abandoned because of bundling issues. I'll just link one example - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836810 - but it's trivial to find more. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
