On 09/11/2015 05:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:35 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
As for which components, it's not about specific examples[1]. It's
about solving the question in a generic way. We have quite a lot of
software that isn't packaged for Fedora (either not started or
aborted
when the package review couldn't be passed) that has genuine value.
I can certainly confirm that. I dug through quite a lot of review
requests yesterday to look at how the rules have been applied in
practice, and found several that have been abandoned because of
bundling issues. I'll just link one example -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836810 - but it's trivial
to find more.
The inclusion of what now 15k components in the distribution is a
testimony of success of un-bundling against your testimony of ( few )
failures of bundling.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
