Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 17:24 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:

> I don't believe this is the pip package maintainer's fault, I believe
> it's due to the fact that our processes for updating packages are far
> too manual and thus require significant amounts of additional work
> following even a backwards compatible upstream release. That then
> makes it impossible to keep up with upstream projects that are making
> new releases every couple of weeks.

Whereas in *other* conversations, we have an apparent consensus that
Fedora ships far too *many* updates, too often.

...which only reinforces the point that considering things in
isolation isn't the way to go.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux