Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sex, 2015-09-11 at 22:41 +0000, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> 
> On 09/11/2015 09:09 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > What does Fedora users gain with "dnf
> > install rails" or "dnf install ipython" versus "gem install rails" and "pip
> > install ipython"?
> 
> This indeed is very good question.

I don't think so , if foo package have a security hole , dnf update will
have an update when pip or gem install don't .
Other big reason is if you need foo package to build foo2 package ,
system doesn't know the existence of foo package with pip or gem ,
neither can force the installation of it when is in a another system. 



> I'm not sure how things are elsewhere in the world but in the case of 
> gem's on a rock in the middle of the north atlantic ocean , everybody is 
> using bundler with nobody wanting to go back to non existing or not 
> current gem's in distributions and or having to manually chase down 
> components and resolve their dependency's.
> 
> They prefer spending that time actually hacking or drinking beer or both.
> 
> JBG

-- 
Sérgio M. B.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux