Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/11/2015 10:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Actually, the opposite is true. RHEL has fewer limitations in this
> space. Red Hat's layered projects ship a fair amount of bundled stuff.
> This problem is entirely Fedora's. Fedora has far stricter rules than
> RHEL in this regard.

It helps that we have paid maintainers for RHEL.  Bundling is not as bad
when there's some assurance that it won't stagnate.  But in general with
unpaid community members, it's harder to be sure things will be actively
maintained.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux