On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 18:27 +0000, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > I agree that the discussion here needs to be more broad-based; see > > the > > other thread fork. I was just providing support for Stephen's > > contention that this is not some airy-fairy theoretical problem, > > there > > are multiple examples of real things that people *wanted* to have > > packaged that are not packaged because the unbundling process was > > too > > onerous. > > > Arguably that is a testament of how heavy the bureaucracy in the > distribution has become not the "bundling" itself. Um. I don't see how you can possibly make that argument. There are multiple package reviews which were abandoned because they needed extensive work on unbundling and the submitters did not want to commit to that ongoing work. I'm not *guessing* this, it's explicitly written down in the comments. In what sense can that 'arguably' be something to do with 'bureaucracy'? Are you saying we should have bundling rules, but then say they're 'bureaucracy' and ignore them? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
