On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 18:59 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > > > > "AW" == Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > writes: > > AW> That just says 'multiple, separate upstream projects' (nothing > about > AW> being 'compiled in'), and implies that absolutely any such case > can > AW> only be included with an explicit 'Bundling Exception'. > > OK, so "compiled in" isn't really the right term if you really want > to > be that picky. I guess it's possible that it's not obvious, so > "package" means built, installable RPM. We don't want more than one > upstream project crammed into a single package. But I get the > feeling > you know this, and so I'm hoping this isn't some kind of ruse to > make me > type more. Er, I don't think I'm being picky. I don't quite know what you meant by 'compiled in' in your original mail, but I can't see any particularly restrictive reading of the phrase 'multiple, separate upstream projects'. I think the fact that we can't even have a discussion of this where we both understand what the current rules actually *are* clearly indicates they have a clarity problem =) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
