Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "AW" == Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

AW> That just says 'multiple, separate upstream projects' (nothing about
AW> being 'compiled in'), and implies that absolutely any such case can
AW> only be included with an explicit 'Bundling Exception'.

OK, so "compiled in" isn't really the right term if you really want to
be that picky.  I guess it's possible that it's not obvious, so
"package" means built, installable RPM.  We don't want more than one
upstream project crammed into a single package.  But I get the feeling
you know this, and so I'm hoping this isn't some kind of ruse to make me
type more.

 - J<
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux