On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:02:31 -0700 Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kernel modules are kind of a grey area because there are differing > opinions on their legality in re the GPL, but in general terms, it's > not correct to say we don't include non-free software for *legal* > reasons. There are plenty of non-free-but-legally-redistributable > things, e.g. Flash. We have always been clear that we disallow non- > free software unconditionally for *philosophical*, not *legal*, > reasons. Wat? From https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ https://wwwimages2.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/legal/licenses-terms/pdf/PlatformClients_PC_WWEULA-en_US-20150407_1357.pdf "3.3 Distribution. This license does not grant you the right to sublicense or distribute the Software" Flash is not legally-redistributable. kevin
Attachment:
pgpHQsp5umE9A.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
