On 08/28/2015 05:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:36:51 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
See:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-August/213209.html
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-August/213208.html
Bugs ... an undefined epoch is supposed to be treated as 0.
No, that's the old case. No Epoch = Epoch 0.
Both cases are equal on the rpm level.
All tools which use rpm need to set their internal representation of an
epoch to 0 if rpm returns an undefined epoch.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
