On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:42:29 +0000, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
>
>> Broken deps for x86_64
>
> Surprisingly, the report is incomplete and doesn't find some unresolvable
> dependencies. DNF doesn't either.
>
> An undefined %{epoch} in a dependency is not found. This has been reported
> to blktap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1248912
>
> Note how DNF tells "Dependencies resolved", but later fails during the
> transaction check. How could it resolve the unexpanded "%{epoch}" earlier?
I'm confused as well, I never saw any problem in this package before.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
